Hodeidah, a port city on Yemen’s Red Sea coast, has long been a focal point of regional and global power struggles. Its deep-water harbor is one of the most critical in Yemen, handling nearly 70% of the country’s imports, including food, fuel, and humanitarian aid. In a nation where war and famine have ravaged the population, control of Hodeidah is not just about economics—it’s about survival.
Hodeidah’s history stretches back centuries, serving as a key trading post for merchants traveling between Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and beyond. The Ottomans recognized its value in the 16th century, fortifying the city to protect their interests. Later, during the British Empire’s dominance in the region, Hodeidah became a contested space, with colonial powers vying for influence over Yemen’s coastline.
By the 20th century, Hodeidah had grown into a bustling port, but its strategic location also made it a target. During Yemen’s civil wars in the 1960s and 70s, the city saw fierce fighting, foreshadowing the brutal conflicts that would engulf it decades later.
The 21st century brought new challenges to Hodeidah. When the Arab Spring reached Yemen in 2011, the country’s political instability deepened, eventually leading to a full-scale civil war by 2014. The Houthi movement, backed by Iran, seized control of Sana’a and later expanded toward Hodeidah. By 2018, the city had become a battleground.
In June 2018, a Saudi-led coalition, supported by the United Arab Emirates and the U.S., launched a massive offensive to retake Hodeidah from the Houthis. The goal was clear: cut off the Houthis’ supply lines and force them into submission. But the battle had devastating consequences.
A fragile ceasefire in late 2018 temporarily halted the bloodshed, but sporadic clashes continued, leaving Hodeidah in a state of tense limbo.
Hodeidah’s suffering is not just Yemen’s problem—it’s a global crisis. The port’s role in food distribution makes it a lifeline for millions. When shipments are blocked or delayed, malnutrition rates soar, children starve, and diseases like cholera spread unchecked.
The war in Yemen is often called a "proxy conflict," with regional and global players pulling the strings:
The question remains: Is Hodeidah a pawn in a larger geopolitical game, or can it become a symbol of peace?
Despite the devastation, Hodeidah’s people have shown remarkable resilience. Local fishermen still brave the waters, even as naval blockades threaten their livelihoods. Aid workers risk their lives to deliver food and medicine. And amid the rubble, small businesses struggle to survive, proving that life persists even in war.
The Stockholm Agreement of 2018 was supposed to be a turning point, but implementation has been slow. Trust between warring factions is nonexistent, and international mediation efforts often stall. Yet, without a stable Hodeidah, Yemen’s recovery is impossible.
Will the world pay attention before it’s too late? Or will Hodeidah remain another forgotten casualty of endless war?